should be fully described in advance or
Data Figure: rafting risky, scenic security measures should be prepared.Reporter correspondent Liu Hu Feng Huang Xu Juan
?
Rafting is a risky leisure,http://www.simu001.cn]3ceshu###/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=781491][第一私募论坛]http://www.simu001.cn]3ceshu###/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=781491], Xiangtan Tam participating units organized rafting, boat with passengers fell into trouble because of an accident, resulting in eight disabled. Much to her angry is that the claimant actually no accepted multiparty afterwards, she sued the paper petition the relevant departments of the court ......
?
News newspaper November 11 & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Xiangtan County Tam pharmaceutical company employees in the organizational unit to Ningxiang play rafting, this benefit did not want to let her unit paid a huge price,http://www.simu001.cn]kkr-nagoya.jp][第一私募论坛]http://www.simu001.cn]kkr-nagoya.jp], Tam at drifting boat during the fall caused by eight disability. Leaving Tam surprise, she spent hundreds of thousands of claims for medical expenses nowhere, desperation she will pharmaceutical companies,http://www.simu001.cn]democratie-socialisme.org/spip.php?article3472][第一私募论坛]http://www.simu001.cn]democratie-socialisme.org/spip.php?article3472], travel agencies, rafting companies, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan of an insurance company of an insurance company to court.
?
Today, Xiangtan County court verdict, rafting companies bear 35% of the liability, travel agents and insurance companies bear responsibility for the Zhuzhou a 35%, 30% Tam themselves bear responsibility.
?
Subject
?
Drifting with the unit, resulting in eight disabled
?
August 8, 2012, Xiangtan County funded organizations,http://rococo.k2.xrea###/bbs/apeboard_plus.cgi/apeboard_plus.c/], including pharmaceutical companies, including Tam employees to participate in tourism activities,http://www.simu001.cn]ristorantemessicanomilano.it]woolrich outlet], Tam and travel agencies signed a travel contract slowly.
?
August 11,http://www.simu001.cn]azionecattolicajesi.it/]piumini woolrich], Tam, who will travel slowly drifting to the project for a rafting company Ningxiang resort operations, tour guide informed drifting precautions.
?
In the drifting process, due to the same chapter of a tourist boat fell off a boat hull after losing balance, Tam also fell off the boat. Shore rafting company personnel have the two men pulled ashore, Tam injured his right hand, constituted after eight identified disability, accident caused economic losses of 185,039 yuan Tam.
?
Prior to slowly travel insurance companies in Zhuzhou a travel agency liability insurance. At the same time, travel agencies as the insured to Tam and other human insured insurance companies in Xiangtan a tourism security group personal accident insurance.
?
Trial
?
Dereliction of rafting companies and travel agencies
?
Court that Tam participate in a rafting company Ningxiang activities under the slowly drifting travel arrangements,http://www.simu001.cn]valmarecchiafestival.it/]scarpe hogan outlet], subject to the command and management of the two companies,http://www.simu001.cn]marandy.be/spip.php?article2741][第一私募论坛]http://www.simu001.cn]marandy.be/spip.php?article2741], there is no violation case.
?
As a tour operator Travel Agencies, Ningxiang a rafting tour company as an auxiliary service providers, on the situation in the tourism process may endanger the tourists' personal and property safety, should be fully described in advance or, in particular a clear warning, and to be taken to prevent harm occurring effective measures. But Ningxiang a rafting company did not make the warning obligation, but did not take measures to prevent harm occurring; although slowly made the necessary travel tips, but security obligations is not complete,http://www.simu001.cn]girodivite.it/spip.php?article21619][第一私募论坛]http://www.simu001.cn]girodivite.it/spip.php?article21619], should bear the responsibility.
?
Tam as adults, after rafting guides inform precautions should know there is a certain degree of risk,http://www.simu001.cn]tonyleungforest###/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=167514&extra=][第一私募论坛]http://www.simu001.cn]tonyleungforest###/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=167514&extra=], respond to their own safety to do reasonable duty of care. Tam there is no fault of their own, it can reduce travel and drifting slowly company's responsibility.
?
focus
?
Why not organize her responsibility to the unit?
?
Combined with the merits, the Court finds that, where appropriate, Travel Agencies,http://www.simu001.cn]postyourasian###][第一私募论坛]http://www.simu001.cn]postyourasian###], Ningxiang consequences of the damage of a rafting company for Tam each bear 35% of the responsibility to compensate 64,763 yuan each. Travel Agencies compensation section in which 59,513 yuan by the Zhuzhou a insurance company (the contract for moral damage compensation insurance company is not compensable).
?
Due process of organizational activities,http://www.simu001.cn]portodirosignano.it]scrape hogan], arrangements are not a pharmaceutical company responsible for pharmaceutical companies in the process of drifting Tam no security obligations, the consequences are not at fault for the damage, loss of Tam pharmaceutical companies are not liable for damages.
?
The case is due to infringement,http://www.simu001.cn]masteralimentazionesicurezza.it/]moncler outlet], the insurance company's non-infringers, so the requirements of Xiangtan Tam responsibility of an insurance company claims, the court shall not support, according to Tam Travel Agencies and Xiangtan an insurance company insurance contracts entered into and enjoy The insurance claims can be handled separately proposition.
?
(Original title: rafting accident, breath sue claims 5 units)
?
Edit: SN182
页:
[1]